Seems that Tucker Carlson has his head buried in Meghan McCain's Boobs........No, Im Serious, just not sure if he is. Apparently Mr. Carlson touts on his Blog that he interviewed the fake impersonator and such interview went as follows:
The Daily Caller was lucky enough to sit down with @McCainBoobette for an interview:
TheDC: Hi Meghan! Thanks for chatting with me!
MM: hi, Im only chatting w/U because your hot, so your welcome
TheDC: I really do appreciate you taking some time off from your book tour to talk with me for a few minutes. How’s the tour been so far?
MM: Tttly awesome. My book is realy important becasue Im a young Republican woman and its been great to meet young ppl at signings who look up to me as a Leader
its really tiring though
TheDC: It was reported that you canceled one stop on the tour saying you were sick and then wound up tweeting from Las Vegas. What happened?
MM: whatEVER, thats just sexist DC reporters talking. No one knows what its like 2 be a young person, so what I played hookey. I love Vegas, you should go
TheDC: Is that the right kind of message to send to all the young people out there who look up to you?
MM: like their ever going to get a book deal LOL. but yeah, you dont understand how tough it is to stay in hotels and order room service on a book tour, and you have 2 travel and stuff, and its like alot of hardships. young people know about hardships & how ya just have to rock it out sometimes to deal with stress.
TheDC: It’s no secret that you have a lot of critics. What do you have to say to people who charge that you aren’t conservative enough?
MM: I say to that BRING IT. I know there really only saying it bcause of how I look, theres so much discrimination and h8 in the world. I represent Conservative values as a rebel, and critics just cant get those conundrums. Until they realize they are loosing all the cool, young voters, they wont get that they need to be like hipper. my critics also need to have more sex
TheDC: What about people who say you only have a platform because of your last name?
MM: Whatever, I know that Im out there being a voice for the unrepresented, and my mom & dad say Im great. It has nothing to do with names and labels. I hate labels except cool ones like Betsy Johnson and Chanel
She may not be on the same team, but it's still sexist. To read the entire article if you want, it is here
Florida independent Senate candidate Charlie Crist personally lobbied Democratic candidate Kendrick Meek to exit the race this week, offering him a cross that had been a gift from his sister, Mr. Meek said Friday.
The gesture occurred Monday as Mr. Crist and Mr. Meek were surrounded by local Jewish leaders at a Hollywood, Fla., meeting of the pro-Israel lobbying group American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
“I was shocked when he did it,” Mr. Meek said in an interview late Friday. “I told him to keep the cross and that I carry my Christianity in my heart.”
Crist spokesman Danny Kanner said he would not comment on a private conversation.
Mr. Meek’s account is the latest turn in an increasingly twisted tale of political intrigue.
Mr. Crist, the Florida governor, had called Mr. Meek, a Miami congressman, earlier that morning, about 4:50 a.m., leaving a voice mail asking if they could meet up at the AIPAC gathering. “I’ll call you later this morning and see if we can work out a time to get together just you and me,” Mr. Crist said in the voice mail, which was played for Washington Wire by Mr. Meek. “Take care, buddy.”
Mr. Meek was scheduled to speak at AIPAC about 8:30 and Mr. Crist at 10, but the governor showed up an hour early in hopes of catching the congressman.
Mr. Meek said he tried to avoid Mr. Crist, but as he left the stage, “there he was, right in front of me.”
“He said, ‘If you were to drop out and work with me and help me we together can beat Marco Rubio,’” Mr. Meek recalled. “I said, ‘Governor, that’s a non-starter.’
“Then he dug down into his pocket and pulled a small cross out,” Mr. Meek continued. “He said his sister gave it to him and he wanted to give it to me so I would think about it.”
Mr. Meek said Mr. Crist had been calling him repeatedly all weekend, and that he blames Mr. Crist for spreading rumors in recent weeks that he was going to drop out of the three–way race against Mr. Rubio, the GOP nominee.
Mr. Crist’s camp had been in contact with aides to former President Bill Clinton, who last week tried to convince Mr. Meek he could not win the race and that exiting might help Mr. Crist defeat Mr. Rubio.
Mr. Crist, on the early-morning voice mail, described himself as a “night owl.” Mr. Meek said he was asleep when the call came in.
“For him to call me at four something in the morning, you know something’s not right,” Mr. Meek said.
*UPDATE* "Kendrick Meek Press Conference "I look forward to being the Next US Senator from Florida. The Story that Politico and CNN are running are False. The President and I are good Friends and he never asked me to drop out. Nobody from the DNC did either I am always been a person of integrity and I stand by my word. Again, I look forward to being the next US Senator from Florida. Bill Clinton has done 11 events for my campaign. I count on his council. Again let me reinstate I look forward to being the Next US Senator from Florida."
Accusations are flying tonight as Politico claims that Former President & Decider Bill Clinton supposedly forcefully asked Senate Hopeful Kendrick Meek to drop out of the Race and endorse Gov. Charlie Crist. An Email released by the Meek Campaign shortly after the Politico story dropped claims "The article is not true. Kendrick Meek was never dropping out of this race, is never dropping out of this race, and will never drop out of this race. Kendrick Meek will always stand up for the middle class and will not leave Floridians a choice between two lifelong conservative Republicans who only stand with the special interests. Kendrick is the Democratic nominee so if anyone should drop out, it's Charlie Crist."
Academic Scholar and friend of the Storm Kenneth Quinnell had the "Honor & Pleasure" of going to see Former 1/2 term Governor of Alaska & Avid Moose Expert Sarah Palin this past weekend in Orlando. Let's see what he reports in this non-exclusive report.
I witnessed Lt. Choi give his West Point ring and Discharge papers to Harry Ried and tell him they ment nothing to him if Reid couldn't overturn "Don't Ask Don't Tell". I am excited to see this article. This is the change I voted for.
Lt. Dan Choi, the Iraq war veteran, Arab linguist, and West Point grad turned “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal activist, today got what he had said he wanted from day one: the opportunity to serve his country in the armed forces again. This afternoon, amid dozens of reporters, and thousands of passersby — most totally unaware they were seeing history in the making — Lt. Dan Choi, the former Army infantry officer, re-enlisted in the military, this time, as an out gay man.
Lt. Choi, who has become the poster child for repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law barring gays from serving openly in the military, had said from the start of his battle to force the government to accept openly gay and lesbian service members into the military, and keep them from discharging them under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” that he would be the first to re-enlist as soon as it was legal for him to do so.
Today, the military announced that it had instructed its recruiters to accept all applications even from those “who admit they are gay or lesbian.” (Sadly, the military is still using the term “admit,” rather than “acknowledge.”)
So, in a two-hour process that began at 3:58 PM, Choi got his wish. Sort of.
The twenty-nine year old had announced his intention to re-enlist, (technically, to be re-instated,) this afternoon, via Twitter. “I’m gonna try to enlist in the Marines today,” he tweeted. That brought throngs of news media and bloggers (yours, truly, had received word as well,) to Times Square.
Military recruiters, busy with another young man enlisting, kept the former Lieutenant waiting at the door for fourteen minutes. Upon seeing Choi, one recruiter picked up the phone, and many of us assumed he was calling his superiors for direction on what to do, given the special circumstances. I confess, we were surprised they weren’t prepared.
Choi had intended to enlist in the Marines, but tweeted at about 5:00 PM, “In the recruiting station. Apparently I’m too old for the Marines! Just filled out the Army application.”
Just before 6:00 PM, amid dozens of reporters, Choi pushed open the door — and had to push aside the media — and waved his enlistment papers in the air.
After the media left, Dan told a few friends, “Looks like I’ve got a job now.”
But, perhaps like millions of Americans, Choi is uncertain how long he will be employed. Right now, the military is allowing openly gay men and women to serve, but only under duress. Judge Virginia Phillips yesterday indicated she was reluctant to lift the injunction she imposed on the military one week ago, forcing them to immediately end all discharges and investigations related to the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law.
The government’s appeal, while not going well, could easily lead to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is perceived as being far more friendly to the military than Judge Phillips. The injunction that prohibits discharges and investigations could soon end, leaving Choi, and any other openly gay and lesbian recruits and service members hanging out to dry.
Just two hours earlier, Dan had said as he walked into Times Square, “It’s a day of celebration!”
Seems that Disgraced DNC member Jon Ausman is trying to save face. He sent out the following email a few minutes ago:
"Jon M. Ausman, Member Democratic National Committee 2202 Woodlawn Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32303-3915 Email: Ausman@embarqmail.com Cell: 850-321-7799
Greetings,
I support Kendrick Meek for the United States Senate and I also plan to vote the straight Democratic ticket. For the area I live in Leon County I plan to vote for:
· Kendrick Meek for the United States Senate;
· Allen Boyd for the United States House, District 2;
· Alex Sink for Governor;
· Dan Gelber for Attorney General;
· Loranne Ausley for Chief Financial Officer;
· Scott Maddox for Agriculture Commissioner;
· Bill Montford for State Senate, District 6; and,
· Michelle Rehwinkel Vaslinda for State House, District 9.
Last week I noted 55% of Florida’s voters did not want Marco Rubio to be elected as one of Florida’s United States Senators. I further observed with the anti-Rubio vote divided between two opposing candidates Rubio could win while not receiving a majority vote.
I then proposed Governor Charlie Crist end his United States Senate campaign so Member of Congress Kendrick Meek could face off against Rubio one-on-one. If this happened I believe Meek would be elected to the United States Senate.
Last week I suggested the two candidates meet with former US Senator Bob Graham (who also served two terms as Governor) and have him mediate a solution to the split opposition against Rubio.
Now, a reporter who was not at the press availability I gave is suggesting I want Meek to dropout. This assertion is exactly the opposite of my position. I support Meek and wish it was just Meek versus Rubio.
This is the second time words have been attributed to me which were never spoken. Earlier in the US Senate campaign I sold access to a list of 35,000 email addresses for $4,000 to then US Senate candidate Jeff Greene. Afterwards, I decided to endorse him and worked for him in north Florida.
Despite losing heavily in the statewide primary Greene did carry 25 of 34 counties in north Florida.
The innuendo made by one reporter was that I had sold my endorsement. This has been repeated endlessly by other reporters without anyone verifying that the innuendo was true or not. It was not true.
I enjoyed working with Greene when I sold him the list and felt he had a shot at winning. I still like him. I was wrong about his chance of winning statewide and now I support our Democratic nominee Kendrick Meek.
If you have any questions or comments please call me at 850-321-7799.
With respect, I am,
Jon M. Ausman, Member
Democratic National Committee"
Doesn't change the fact that his endorsement can still be sold to the highest bidder
Seems that Michael Hussey, a contributor to Pushing Rope is still sore at losing at life. He still has nothing better to do than attack the same team he claims to be on. Please allow me to take a second and point out something. Sunshine State news could be the most conservative paper on the face of the planet for all I care. This time they got the story right on Ausman.Let me explain something to everybody, A good friend of mine once said "I'm an asshole, I know I'm and asshole and if you don't like it, there's the fucking door." Anybody who knows me knows that there is no filter between me and the keyboard so I thought I would start by warning you this isn't going to be pretty, or politically correct. You throw statements at a friend of mine, especially if they are inaccurate, you better be willing to back that shit up.
Little bit ago, I noticed a friend and mentor of mine, Kenneth Quinnell was being attacked by false statements. Usually I would let things go because I understand I don't have the best way of dealing with drama. Seeing how many times this accuser had to jump on twitter and his blog to attack Quinnell was really starting to get to me. Where I come from you drink a cup of concrete and harden up before you step to the person you have an issue with, whether that be on the phone or in person NOT in 140 characters or less, WHEN THE DAMN MESSAGE ISN'T EVEN SENT TO HIM.
I AM PRETTY SURE THAT'S THE NEW DEFINITION OF A BITCH MOVE
(Kinda like how I am going to post this and not send it to his blog or their emails or their twitters)
Earlier today, Hussey came up with a post that can only be defined as mind numbing. He decided to out in out say that Kenneth Quinnell, The creator of the Florida Progressive Coalition, The former New Media Director for Kendrick Meek, (Who was released because he has kids in elementary school and cares more about them then this temporary job. I.E., HE IS A FAMILY MAN)
Now as far as you talking shit about Quinnell Let me make this an ordered list:
1)You want to make it seem as if the campaign fired him for doing something wrong. Well considering that he hasn't said that AND If you ever see the site, You would see that the campaign that fired him has apparently bought an advertisement that you can see occasionally on the right side of this page. IF YOU FIRE SOMEBODY ON BAD TERMS, WHY WOULD YOU GIVE THEM MONEY? YOU SIR ARE THE ASS CLOWN!
2) Yea, he lost to Jon Ausman, the same dude who is now caught in scandal for taking money for endorsing ......HA funny story, Kendrick Meek's former opponent Jeff Greene who was SLAUGHTERED in the Primary. NEXT TIME YOU CHOOSE A FUCKING TEAM, CHOOSE THE RIGHT ONE ASS CLOWN!
3)As far as "sucking at outreach" as you said in a previous attack, You are firmly aware that there were articles written about how much outreach and Social Networking the Kendrick Meek campaign was doing right? Naw you must have missed them being too busy knocking your own parties candidate and all. It's cool I understand.
4)Personally, I can give a shit less about what your little posts says because in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't me jack shit. You want to sit there and say how "OH KENDRICKS GONNA LOSE BY A LANDSLIDE AND HERE'S THE MUSIC VIDEO FROM FLEETWOOD MAC DEE DEE DA DEE" Apparently we have a fucking comedian on the internet. Lets ask a realy one what he thinks.......
It's Douchbags like you that are going to be bitching about Crist or Rubio running shit when you didn't do ONE FUCKING POSITIVE THING TO HELP THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE!
POINT IS: LEARN WHAT OUR CANDIDATE STANDS FOR AND START KNOCKING ON SOME GOD DAMN DOORS OR STFU FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS!
Please believe that within a matter of days, I will have my video up showing my support for WWE.
Lets set some things straight:
Accusation: “…the company…has been criticized for violent and sexually suggestive programming.” Peter Wallsten – The Wall Street Journal – July 2, 2010
Truth:
* All of WWE’s programming has been TV-PG since June 2008. * Friday Night SmackDown, which made its network debut in 1999 has always been rated TV-PG. * 87 percent of WWE fans say WWE content is appropriate for families. * Of the 14 million weekly viewers in the United States that watch WWE programming, six million are women.
Accusation: “Putting profits before people.” Richard Blumenthal Ads – 2010
Truth:
* World Wrestling Entertainment first opened its office in 1983 with 13 employees. Today it employees approximately 600 people and pays out $60 million in salaries for those based in Connecticut alone. * WWE provides a comprehensive benefits package to all full-time employees including medical, dental, vision, 401(k) and employee stock purchase plans. * 110 employees have been with WWE for more than 10 years. * WWE has 140 Superstars and Divas currently under contract as independent contractors. * The average active roster WWE Talent earns more than $550,000 annually, with WWE covering 100 percent of all costs associated with any in-ring related injuries and rehabilitation. * In 2011, WWE plans to hire between 100-140 employees in anticipation of the launch of the WWE cable network. * WWE has a longstanding commitment to give back to communities through literacy programs, support of the military and their families, and a more than 25 year relationship with the Make-A-Wish Foundation.
Accusation: “…the state Democratic Party has criticized…other business practices, particularly its classifying performers as independent contractors who do not receive health benefits from WWE.” - Ed Stannard – New Haven Register – Sept. 5, 2010
Truth:
* WWE covers 100 percent of all costs associated with any in-ring related injuries and rehabilitation. * The Talent Wellness Program, fully funded by WWE, calls for regular cardiovascular testing and monitoring, ImPACT™ testing for brain function, annual physicals, medical referrals and blood screening of WWE Talent, as well as substance abuse and random drug testing. * WWE offers current and former talent who may have substance abuse problems complete drug rehabilitation at no cost to them. WWE is the only entertainment company that provides this type of assistance and ongoing support to its former performers. * WWE invests nearly $3.5 million annually in the talents’ health and wellness programs.
Accusation: “The company also has been accused of looking the other way as wrestlers, feeling pressured to maintain the pumped-up bodies showcased in the W.W.E., turned to steroids.” - Ray Hernandez & Joshua Brustein – The New York Times – July 15, 2010
Truth:
* WWE’s Talent Wellness Policy strictly prohibits the use of steroids, the abuse of prescription medications, performance enhancing drugs and the use, possession and/or distribution of illegal drugs. * WWE’s entire substance abuse and drug testing policy is independently administered by third party leading medical experts. * The Talent Wellness Program is designed to result in all WWE Talent being tested at a minimum four times a year, but may result in more frequent testing due to the random selection process.
Accusation: “Lack of athletic-board scrutiny also ensured that the WWE’s wrestlers would not be subject to drug tests.” – Andy Barr – Politico – Aug. 10, 2010
Truth:
* WWE is still regulated in 21 states and the District of Columbia, where rules and regulations can differ. The company's Talent Wellness Program is far stricter than any medical or drug testing required by the states. * Much like Ringling Bros. Circus and Harlem Globetrotters, WWE is sheer entertainment and therefore should not be under the purview of the antiquated rules and regulations of State Athletic Commissions. * WWE pays gross admissions taxes on ticket sales similar to concerts or other live entertainment events in states that we are not regulated.
Accusation: “The allegations against WWE seem to be criminal in nature…because allegations about independent contractors are investigated by the Department of Labor and the Department of Revenue Services...” Richard Blumenthal – Oct. 4, 2010
Truth:
* WWE has always complied with the law, and constantly reviews its internal practices and procedures to comply with ever-changing employee laws. * For the entirety of WWE’s existence, WWE talent have been classified as independent contractors and not employees. * There is not now, nor has there ever been, any criminal investigation into WWE’s treatment of its Superstars as independent contractors. * WWE’s treatment and reporting of its talent as independent contractors has never been challenged or questioned by any federal or state regulatory body during the entirety of WWE’s existence. * Up until this election, WWE has not been investigated in the past for independent contractor classification.
Whether it's the Tea Party , Bill O'Reilly calling for Shirley Sherrod's resignation, Rush Limbaugh in disapproval of Sonia Sotomayor's commission, Glenn Beck and Michelle Bachmann's misrepresentations of the President - They all have one thing in common;They're the same sheep who take words like Socialism away from their meaning to spark emotions that can help them win elections and get sponsored. Now, they're just making up new ones: Reverse racism.
What it doesn't mean:
We hear about the benign examples of "reverse racism" that infer majorities are being singled out (really) and are being limited from opportunities; The job that could have benefited the more qualified candidate or the scholarship that could have went to the other student with higher SAT scores. Except someone didn't just wake up on the left side of the bed one morning to say, "Oh gee, how do I kill off this guilty white symbiote living inside of my innately racist Caucasian shell?" In order to state affirmative action as racist (or reverse racist), you would have to leave reality and reside in a funnel vacuum where context is null. There's that tiny thing, you know from American History, that resolves why judicial review replaced nullification.
An admissions department may then attempt to "redress" these findings of past discrimination by considering an applicant'srace as a "plus" factoramong many in its admissions decisions.Such a race-conscious consideration, however,may only be one of many factors used in assessing each applicant, and the race of each applicant may never be a preclusive factor in granting admission.
This applies to education, hiring and contracting: Affirmative action isn't bequeathing people jobs who aren't qualified to interview for them - it's a plus factor among many different considerations after the hiring process is at an end. After being qualified. After being interviewed. After Richard Pryor calls you a dead honkey. Only when a company has a proven history of discrimination, then does affirmative action apply. This discrimination is defined by current and past effects. The state "has a legitimate and substantial interest in eliminating the disabling effects of identified discrimination."
It is from those very reasons, affirmative action isn't illegal. Quotas, however, are; In the same1978 hearing by an apparently liberal Supreme Court, California vs Bakke held that quotas based on race or gender were unconstitutional. So if someone says that a business or group is interviewing or reviewing based on race or gender quotas, particularly in circumstances of education, hiring and contracting - it's either who they're talking about is doing it illegally or the person who makes the claim is, well, lying to you. It's racism. In reverse. No, literally.
Let's go further to say that even if people were getting hired by terms of race or gender, then wouldn't that in itself be ...racism? In other words, isn't any behavior or attitude held on the single pillar of race alone defined as racist? What makes it reverse racist?
One explanation in an attempt to answer this question was that reverse racism or discrimination is differentiated because the group being disadvantaged is labeled a majority. There is not validity in that argument because racism isn't based on the size of the target or whether the action is positive or negative; it's based on race. So what's the reverse part for?
Well, in a grammatical sense reverse racism would be the opposite of racism (or racism, in reverse). By the standards of semantics that would be the behavior of upholding the equality of all races - which, in illustrations of reverse racism, doesn't happen. The only consistency about reverse racism I can find is that it applies to, and is prevalently used by, white people. Since that alone doesn't define the word, maybe we should accept it for what it really is - a grammatical error.
In accords to #1 definition on Urban Dictionary (The only dictionary website that had the word...and don't get a wiki-fit because we all know to have critical credibility you can't source Wikipedia in it's unreliable lonesome):
I'm going out on a limb here people, but bear with me... Reverse racism, in actuality, shouldn't even be a term... It's described as the act of racism against a majority (typically used in context of whites). But...isn't that just plain old regular racism? Last time I checked, Caucasian WAS a race. And I'm willing to bet that any other majority suffering from "reverse racism" is a race too. So why isn't it just racism? Why give it a fancy new term? If you wanted to take the literal definition, reverse racism would actually be the opposite: supporting a race as equal to another. Just a thought. by Atticus Apr 23, 2005
*First and Foremost, under no circumstances am I a Linda McMahon Supporter, so I don't want to hear shit about that.This is coming from the eyes of a spectator & supporter of the WWE Product and a performer of Independent Wrestling. However as I have stated in previous blogs, people are not telling the whole story. On the popular show "Morning Joe", The entire crew decided it was time to jump on the WWE product yet again and specifically choose one angle to consistently run on.
Joe, weren't you a Republican at one point? How bout I harp on that for the next century eh? Linda McMahon was not in charge of Creative Control. In fact, I would be surprised if she knows what has ever gone on in the Creative Dept. However, Here is my point.
You're gonna talk about the Trish/Vince angle but not the work done with:
Make-A-Wish
Or Every Christmas we have been in Combat in Iraq when Vince and Linda pack the entire show up and go to Iraq for their Annual "Tribute to the Troops"
All I am asking for citizens is to tell the *WHOLE* *STORY*. No Business has ever been 100% on the up and up. Somebody has always been fired for a profit, Somebody has been undercut and deals have been made. In The "Attitude Era" alot of things were done that defined the business. Yes some were regrettable but none the less part of the business. I have done some things that I I am not to happy about in this business but it was for the good of the show. As far as " I don't want this crap available for anybody to watch" comment,learn to be a responsible parent & change the damn channel. How's that taste. If I want to take my child or whoever to a show, I have instilled the fact that these are actors and performers. If something Batshit crazy happens, I have the ability to explain to the child that this is not how we act in proper society, but it's ok to dislike the person for doing this action. THAT IS THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF THE SHOW, THE BATTLE OF GOOD AND EVIL!
How bout you go jump on Brett Farve for Sexting Jen Sterger some more or Ben Roethlisberger for sexually assaulting that chick in Georgia and getting away with it. AssClowns
You are a New Left Hipster, also known as a MoveOn.org liberal, a Netroots activist, or a Daily Show fanatic. You believe that if we really want to defend American values, conservative hatriots must be exposed and mocked for every fanatical, puritanical, paranoid, fact-allergic, reality-challenged, obstructionist ideal for which they stand.
